“Furthermore studies show that the brain operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as studying.”

It’s Not Controversial: The Importance of Sense of balance
Sands singapore short declares the newer $2 billion credit history capability. Horseracing facility because of the light that is green Vietnam
Show all

“Furthermore studies show that the brain operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as studying.”

“Furthermore studies show that the brain operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as studying.”

Then complete the sentence with “Therefore recreational time from the students’ schedule would have detrimental effects.”

Also, not the more vocabulary that is specific.

I’m speaking about “schedule”

This is certainly vocabulary that is good it is vocabulary only pertaining to education or specially associated with education.

So it shows the examiner I’ve got rich vocabulary.

“Many people say that globalization therefore the growing quantity of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environment.”

“to what extent to you personally agree or disagree.”

“Use specific reasons and examples to aid your position.”

So what’s the crooks of this question?

“That globalization and multinational companies are damaging the environmental surroundings. Having an adverse effect.”

So first: Globalization, definitely damaging the environment.

I really could be long. I really could give an extended and complex, more answer that is accurate that:

“Globalization is increasing the price of world economic resources which can be therefore enhancing the cost of substitute products (or rival products) such as ecological energy from wind farms blah that is… blah, blah…”

But the examiner does care n’t. Yeah?

He desires to see just something logical.

So I’m just likely to take simple route.

Something that is going to be very easy to explain and where I’ve got some vocabulary that is good.

Let’s go. This will http://www.123helpme.biz/ be my idea:

“Increased interaction between countries”

“Leads to boost goods and services traded”

“Which means more production”

“Therefore more resource extraction” (such as for example mining)…

Maybe I’ll remove that in my own sentence that is final’cause i possibly could just speak about the example, which may be:

“For example, in China (largely considered the workshop around the globe), in several cities air pollution masks are essential to commute round the city center.”

So therefore, I’ve proved my point. I said that globalization is damaging environmental surroundings.

And it’s an easy task to follow.

Next, I have to get back to the relevant question’cause I wanted to test.

The 2nd point was about multinationals.

Once more, I’ve taken the route that is simple. It says,

“Multinationals have the effect of side effects within the environment.”

It’s quite a big statement to say that. But I’m just gonna say “yes.”

I’m just likely to say “yes” given that it’s simple.

I’m getting points for my language, not for the quality of my ideas.

“Yes, multinationals do increase pollution.”

“Globalization requires solutions that are globalthese can have drastic consequences if accidents happen).”

Of course I’m going to enhance it a bit that is little that’s the main section of my argument.

It says, “A negative effect into the environment” when you look at the question.

Here, I’ve put “increased pollution” more or less is saying.”

I’ve put “destroyed the local ecosystem” during my example.

During my example, I talk about:

The Gulf of Mexico

The oil pill (a few years ago)

… destroyed the system that is local.

It proves my point.

And them before, I said “drastic consequences” just another collocation there if you’ve caught.

Yet again, get in a solid plan together,

place in down the points,

thinking of an example which will correspond,

then I’ve got 2 solid paragraphs.

Now, all i need to do is my conclusion and my introduction.

That we can draw through the physical body paragraphs.

“Parents desire to achieve balance between family career but only a manage that is few achieve it.”

“What do you consider is the reason?”

“Discuss possible solutions and offer examples.”

Now, we’ve got the issue and a possible solution.

Therefore the first paragraph will be what’s the good reason why there clearly was a challenge searching for the total amount between family and career.

My paragraph that is second will suggest solutions.

This will be significant.

I’ve paid attention towards the question and every paragraph will correspond

to the question,

into the parts of the question,

structures for the question,

and therefore I’m going to pick up points for Task Response.

Let’s take a glance.

“The first reasons why there is an imbalance…”

Notice as well, I used the form that is negative of verb.

It says, “It’s tough to achieve a balance,” so I said, “The reason for the imbalance…”

“… is because there’s increased competition within the place of work,”

“changes in society,”

“increase within the number of working mothers put pressure on the family…”

As you care able to see, I’ve got quite a points that are few. Therefore I might cut them down and just use the ones most highly relevant to my example.

And my example (once again) is totally invented however it’s believable. Here it is:

“Studies in the United States (US) show that families with two full-time parents are more inclined to separate.”

“Therefore, this indicates that choosing the balance is incredibly difficult.”

This is why. It’s this that I think.

They’re more prone to separate. Full time, a lot of stress, it’s likely to be difficult.

Paragraph two, possible solutions.

Possible solutions. Here, I’ve just gone for something that fitted…

I came with my example first, after which I was thinking “Okay, I’m able to opt for this route.”

First I was thinking of France having a working week that is 35-hour.

(which can be quite outrageous if you’re coming from the UK and through the United States to even do this.)

(Due to the culture that individuals have there when you look at the UK).

And so the solution will be:

Regulations through the government.

Government could legislate for increasing maternity leave.

More working that is flexible.

Reduced working week.

The government proposed and implemented a 35-hour working week. as an example, “In France”

Also, large amount of collocations there.

“flexible working practices”

Make use of these. Once you can get in special vocabulary that you’re only planning to find dealing with this topic.

So we’ve done a few questions about globalization, also touching regarding the environment.

We’ve done a few about education.

Now, we’re planning to do one about… Well, a different one about equality.

“Nowadays men and women fork out a lot of cash on beauty care. It was not very in the past.”

“What could be the root cause of the behavior?”

“Discuss the reasons and possible results.”

Now that one was tricky.

That one was tricky it’s difficult to find the examples about this for me because.

Specifically for 2 paragraphs.

Okay, it wasn’t difficult. It was a little more of a challenge and I need to think more.

Nonetheless it’s important that the thinking is done by you process beforehand.

So let’s have a look at paragraph 1.

You the answers, try and think of some ideas yourself before I tell.

The more times you do this,

the greater times you look at a concern

and think of examples,

think about arguments,

the simpler it gets.

Especially concerning the examples.

Especially if you invented the examples.

So my idea was basically marketing.

I’ll give you the relevant question again:

“Nowadays both men and women spend a lot of cash on beauty care. This is not very when you look at the past.”

“What could be the root cause for this behavior?”

“Discuss the reasons and possible results.”

My idea for paragraph 1:

For this, it’s rather easy to think about examples ’cause we have been confronted with publicity everyday.

So that it’s not that difficult.

“The beauty marketplace for women will probably be worth millions, consumer goods companies see similar prospect of the male market.”

Yet again, just bullet points.

“Therefore developing new ranges, e.g. L’Oreal for Men Expert.”

“Therefore the reason is the possibility opportunity.”

“The female marketplace for women may be worth millions.”

“The male market isn’t developed.”

“Therefore developing the male market and we’ve practically doubled our sales.”

So let’s take a look at a number of the collocations.

“consumer goods companies”

And I also can even say, “Consumer goods companies such as L’Oreal, Proctor and Gamble, Johnson and Johnson…”

“see the potential for male market”

For example, L’Oreal developed a professional.

If I set up all of these ideas together in a single cohesive paragraph…

Of course you need to know how exactly to write a paragraph that is cohesive take a look at the sentence guide at

Because that provides you with just a formula that is really simple used to drop your ideas in and presto.